Re: TRM - Morbidity has set in, or not?

From: Bob Badour <bbadour_at_pei.sympatico.ca>
Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 04:24:53 GMT
Message-ID: <pAxag.8691$A26.220515@ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca>

vldm10 wrote:

> Frank Hamersley wrote:
> 

>>I just stumbled over this exchange from Oct 2005 on the TRM...
>>
>> http://www.dbms2.com/2005/10/10/17/
>>
>>It was authored by a "Curt Monash" - is he known to any CDT'ers and/or
>>credible?
>>
>>Is there any veracity in _any_ of the claims made by _any_ of the parties?
>>
>>Given lots of mud gets flung as the discussion proceeds so I wondered if
>>there was any corroborative or contrary sources.
>>
>>Cheers, Frank.

> 
> You can try my solution. It effectively shows how to decompose
> arbitrary relation into its binary relations. It is on my web site:
> www.dbdesign10.com
> Yesterday I added two new small chapters (4 and 5) that are about
> "theoretical" side of this problem. I believe that my solution is
> simple, correct and more general than TransRelatinal Model (TM).
> 
> Vladimir Odrljin

I found your web article confusing. Are you defining a logical data model? Or a conceptual model?

If it is a conceptual model, correctness is not particularly relevant.

If it was supposed to be a logical data model, it wasn't simple. Received on Tue May 16 2006 - 23:24:53 CDT