Re: TRM - Morbidity has set in, or not?

From: Frank Hamersley <terabitemightbe_at_bigpond.com>
Date: Sun, 14 May 2006 04:41:54 GMT
Message-ID: <myy9g.3567$S7.1294_at_news-server.bigpond.net.au>


Gene Wirchenko wrote:

> On Fri, 12 May 2006 21:55:55 GMT, paul c <toledobythesea_at_oohay.ac>

>> Marshall Spight wrote:

>>> Frank Hamersley wrote:

[..]

>> I believe he is bound by some non-disclosure agreement and since the
>> business involved has gone awry, he is stuck. So you can hardly blame
>> him except perhaps for not having the foresight to sign a NDA that had
>> no expiry date.

> 
>      An NDA is my understanding, too.  I do not know about the expiry
> date bit though.  BTW, I am a regular reader of dbdebunk.com.

Is the business defunct (in liquidation) or has it been procured by others? I guess the NDA has survived these events and has not been extinguished hence he must remain silent. I suspect if he (et al) has been conned (as was suggested in the past) by the TRM proponents he must be very irritated by this state of affairs!

[..]

>>> As an aside, I note that Mr. Pascal spends quite a lot of time telling
>>> us how smart and logical he is, ...
> 
>      As a regular reader of dbdebunk.com, I call bullshit!

I raise you the bull... *

>> Well, I've read at least a few hundred pages written by him and although
>> I didn't understand parts of it, I can't recall him boasting about
>> himself, not even once.

and its holy cow! * :-)

> 
>>> and how all of his opponents are stupid,
>>> ignorant, and illogical.

This aspect is a common thread in dbdebunk postings.

All that said there is nothing wrong with this posture if you are capable of substantiating this at every turn of events. Of course it can go pear shaped if you meet your match or you pick a loser - but that is FP's risk and his call to place his own bets.

[..]

>      Perish the thought that someone should have an agenda.  I like
> FP's of supporting the RM.  It is far better than these slimy Latest
> Things that keep popping up from under rocks.

For sure. My only concern is having made himself a target of the naysayers, if he stumbles for what ever reason, it has the potential to tarnish the RM in the minds of under informed types. A lesser evil perhaps than allowing snake-oil to be sold in super-markets?

[..]

Cheers, Frank. Received on Sun May 14 2006 - 06:41:54 CEST

Original text of this message