Re: Anybody for changing light bulbs?

LOL
I think this has something to do with circus theory: http://www.adze.com/zine/lightbul.html

"mAsterdam" <mAsterdam_at_vrijdag.org> wrote in message news:445bd14c$0$31640$e4fe514c_at_news.xs4all.nl...
> David Cressey wrote:
>
> > If you look for "how many forum members does it take to change a light
> > bulb?" You'll get this amusing little piece.
> >
> > http://forum.cmcentral.com/index.php?act=ST&f=0&t=40533
> >
> > Does this sound familiar?
>
> Not at all ;-)
>
> 5 to argue that using carbide lamps would not require changing any light
> bulbs
>
> 1 who states that fittings don't give value for money - direct soldering
> is much easier
>
> 1 who claims that this could be done more general/systematic/flexible
> with neon lbd
>
> 1 who calls all of the above self-aggrandizing ignorants - they don't
> even know bajonet-fittings (BF)
>
> 3 to say "Me too" to that: BF is the one true way to changing
> lightbulbs, dammit!
>
> 4 who claim lbd is just DC lightbulbs
>
> 2 claiming lbd is just AC lightbulbs
>
> 3 comparing relative transport-cost formula's for AC and DC
>
> 2 to state that other gasses than neon might do
>
> 2 to demonstrate some of neon lbd's features in probulb
>
>
Received on Mon May 08 2006 - 15:26:52 CEST