Re: E/R modeling: relationship's attributes
From: x <x_at_not-exists.org>
Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 14:02:08 +0300
Message-ID: <e3n8c4$bnb$2_at_emma.aioe.org>
Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 14:02:08 +0300
Message-ID: <e3n8c4$bnb$2_at_emma.aioe.org>
"Neo" <neo55592_at_hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1146797650.857905.84030_at_y43g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
> > > > >>>> Could you first define what you mean by quoting properly
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> Part of it is indicating properly who said what ...
> > > > >>
> > > > >> What are the other parts and what do you consider to be
"indicating
> > > > >> properly who said what"?
> > > > >
> > > > > *sigh* I should have know. This conversation is over.
> > > > > > > > Yes, I agree. You should have. Finally! Woo hoo! > > > > > > Are *Sighing* and Woo Hooing (a) against netiquette and (b) against > > > the law? > > > > C'mon, it doesn't hurt to be decent, and just quote people properly if > > they ask you to - especially if those people are putting their own > > valuable time and effort in to engage with you. Think about it.
> Could you first define what you mean by quoting people properly?
Nice loop :-) Received on Mon May 08 2006 - 13:02:08 CEST