Re: Lucid statement of the MV vs RM position?
From: Marshall Spight <marshall.spight_at_gmail.com>
Date: 7 May 2006 23:48:49 -0700
Message-ID: <1147070928.959736.152010_at_e56g2000cwe.googlegroups.com>
Date: 7 May 2006 23:48:49 -0700
Message-ID: <1147070928.959736.152010_at_e56g2000cwe.googlegroups.com>
Jon Heggland wrote:
> Marshall Spight wrote:
> >
> > You describe two things. You say they are different, but I don't
> > see any differences.
>
> Then I don't know how to convince you. Shall I show you the grammar?
> http://web.onetel.com/~hughdarwen/TheThirdManifesto/APPXI.pdf
> Is that operator the aggregate operator SUM()? Certainly not; for one
> thing, SUM() produces a numerical value, not a relation. Rather, it is
> the relational operator SUMMARIZE, *using* the aggregate operator SUM as
> part of its invocation. Do you agree with this?
Sure.
Marshall Received on Mon May 08 2006 - 08:48:49 CEST