Re: Lucid statement of the MV vs RM position?
From: Marshall Spight <marshall.spight_at_gmail.com>
Date: 7 May 2006 23:45:18 -0700
Message-ID: <1147070718.243398.210900_at_g10g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>
Date: 7 May 2006 23:45:18 -0700
Message-ID: <1147070718.243398.210900_at_g10g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>
Bob Badour wrote:
>
> In the end, I think you and I focused on function while Jon focused on form.
Ah, this explanation makes perfect sense. Thanks.
> One can easily look at GROUP as a convenient shorthand for a combined
> type conversion and aggregate.
Just so.
Marshall Received on Mon May 08 2006 - 08:45:18 CEST