Re: Lucid statement of the MV vs RM position?

paul c wrote:
> Thanks, that makes sense as far as ttm is concerned. I often get in
> trouble with TABLE_DEE, using the shorthand, I suppose one could have
> written something like R JOIN RELATION {attributenamenotinR, TABLE_DEE}.

Huh? In Tutorial D, what you put within the braces of a "RELATION {...}" expression is a tuple expression commalist. "attributenamenotinR" is not a tuple expression; neither is TABLE_DEE.

-- 
Jon