Re: E/R modeling: relationship's attributes
From: Bob Badour <bbadour_at_pei.sympatico.ca>
Date: Fri, 05 May 2006 17:30:00 GMT
Message-ID: <sYL6g.3639$A26.94506_at_ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca>
>
>
> One attributes the words one quotes by leaving the posters name above
> the quotation, just as everyone else does. This is such a simple thing
> I can only think that you are intentionally attempting to alienate
> everyone you interact with. Please prove otherwise.
Date: Fri, 05 May 2006 17:30:00 GMT
Message-ID: <sYL6g.3639$A26.94506_at_ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca>
JOG wrote:
> Neo wrote:
>
>>>>>>>>>Could you first define what you mean by quoting properly >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>Part of it is indicating properly who said what ... >>>>>>> >>>>>>>What are the other parts and what do you consider to be "indicating >>>>>>>properly who said what"? >>>>>> >>>>>> *sigh* I should have know. This conversation is over. >>>>> >>>>>Yes, I agree. You should have. Finally! Woo hoo! >>>> >>>>Are *Sighing* and Woo Hooing (a) against netiquette and (b) against >>>>the law? >>> >>>C'mon, it doesn't hurt to be decent, and just quote people properly if >>>they ask you to - especially if those people are putting their own >>>valuable time and effort in to engage with you. Think about it. >> >>Could you first define what you mean by quoting people properly?
>
>
> One attributes the words one quotes by leaving the posters name above
> the quotation, just as everyone else does. This is such a simple thing
> I can only think that you are intentionally attempting to alienate
> everyone you interact with. Please prove otherwise.
Don't attribute to malice that which one can attribute to stupidity. Especially in Neo's case. Received on Fri May 05 2006 - 19:30:00 CEST