Re: E/R modeling: relationship's attributes

From: Bob Badour <bbadour_at_pei.sympatico.ca>
Date: Fri, 05 May 2006 17:30:00 GMT
Message-ID: <sYL6g.3639$A26.94506@ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca>

JOG wrote:

> Neo wrote:
>

>>>>>>>>>Could you first define what you mean by quoting properly
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Part of it is indicating properly who said what ...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>What are the other parts and what do you consider to be "indicating
>>>>>>>properly who said what"?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *sigh* I should have know. This conversation is over.
>>>>>
>>>>>Yes, I agree. You should have. Finally! Woo hoo!
>>>>
>>>>Are *Sighing* and Woo Hooing  (a) against netiquette and (b) against
>>>>the law?
>>>
>>>C'mon, it doesn't hurt to be decent, and just quote people properly if
>>>they ask you to - especially if those people are putting their own
>>>valuable time and effort in to engage with you. Think about it.
>>
>>Could you first define what you mean by quoting people properly?

>
>
> One attributes the words one quotes by leaving the posters name above
> the quotation, just as everyone else does. This is such a simple thing
> I can only think that you are intentionally attempting to alienate
> everyone you interact with. Please prove otherwise.

Don't attribute to malice that which one can attribute to stupidity. Especially in Neo's case. Received on Fri May 05 2006 - 12:30:00 CDT