Re: E/R modeling: relationship's attributes

Neo wrote:
> > > > >>>> Could you first define what you mean by quoting properly
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> Part of it is indicating properly who said what ...
> > > > >>
> > > > >> What are the other parts and what do you consider to be "indicating
> > > > >> properly who said what"?
> > > > >
> > > > > *sigh* I should have know. This conversation is over.
> > > >
> > > > Yes, I agree. You should have. Finally! Woo hoo!

> > >
> > > Are *Sighing* and Woo Hooing  (a) against netiquette and (b) against
> > > the law?
> >
> > C'mon, it doesn't hurt to be decent, and just quote people properly if
> > they ask you to - especially if those people are putting their own
> > valuable time and effort in to engage with you. Think about it.
>
> Could you first define what you mean by quoting people properly?

One attributes the words one quotes by leaving the posters name above the quotation, just as everyone else does. This is such a simple thing I can only think that you are intentionally attempting to alienate everyone you interact with. Please prove otherwise. Received on Fri May 05 2006 - 19:25:17 CEST