Re: E/R modeling: relationship's attributes
From: JOG <jog_at_cs.nott.ac.uk>
Date: 4 May 2006 19:23:33 -0700
Message-ID: <1146795813.445925.236560_at_i39g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
Date: 4 May 2006 19:23:33 -0700
Message-ID: <1146795813.445925.236560_at_i39g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
Neo wrote:
> > >>>> Could you first define what you mean by quoting properly
> > >>>
> > >>> Part of it is indicating properly who said what ...
> > >>
> > >> What are the other parts and what do you consider to be "indicating
> > >> properly who said what"?
> > >
> > > *sigh* I should have know. This conversation is over.
> >
> > Yes, I agree. You should have. Finally! Woo hoo!
> > Are *Sighing* and Woo Hooing (a) against netiquette and (b) against > the law?
C'mon, it doesn't hurt to be decent, and just quote people properly if they ask you to - especially if those people are putting their own valuable time and effort in to engage with you. Think about it. Received on Fri May 05 2006 - 04:23:33 CEST