Re: The OverRelational Manifesto ("TheORM"). Needs to be debunked.

From: Alfredo Novoa <alfredo_novoa_at_hotmail.com>
Date: 4 May 2006 17:14:13 -0700
Message-ID: <1146788052.987606.234930@u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com>

>I'll try to explain it once again using old analogy I met long years
>ago. Some guy (I don't remember who he was) sayd, that using RDBMS with
>OO system looks like the disassembling of car during its garaging. When
>we use a car (object) it is integral, whole thing, but when it is in
>garage (in RDB) - it is a set of details.

>I'm not sure if this comparition is correct.

It is completely stupid. The rest of your post is even more stupid. Plonk. Received on Thu May 04 2006 - 19:14:13 CDT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Kenneth Downs: "Re: Storing derived and derivable data"
Previous message: paul c: "Re: Lucid statement of the MV vs RM position?"
In reply to: U-gene: "Re: The OverRelational Manifesto ("TheORM"). Needs to be debunked."
Next in thread: U-gene: "Re: The OverRelational Manifesto ("TheORM"). Needs to be debunked."
Reply: U-gene: "Re: The OverRelational Manifesto ("TheORM"). Needs to be debunked."

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US