Oracle FAQ

Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> comp.databases.theory -> Re: Design question: one big field or slave table

Re: Design question: one big field or slave table

From: Bob Badour <bbadour_at_pei.sympatico.ca>
Date: Thu, 04 May 2006 11:15:19 GMT
Message-ID: <bnl6g.3051$A26.80749@ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca>

Matthieu wrote:

> Ok thanks you for your answers.
> I'll post my query on comp.databases.
>
> The DBMS is Oracle (9 to 10)

Are you just seeking a better class of crank? Received on Thu May 04 2006 - 06:15:19 CDT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: U-gene: "Re: The OverRelational Manifesto ("TheORM"). Needs to be debunked."
Previous message: Bob Badour: "Re: Lucid statement of the MV vs RM position?"
In reply to: Matthieu: "Re: Design question: one big field or slave table"
Next in thread: Jay Dee: "Re: Design question: one big field or slave table"
Reply: Jay Dee: "Re: Design question: one big field or slave table"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US