Re: Lucid statement of the MV vs RM position?
Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 10:12:07 +0200
>> dawn wrote: >>> We can do both ;-) We ought not dismiss relations, nor modeling with >>> relations, but we do need to go beyond the RM to include lists, for >>> example, which the Information Principle (of the RM) does not permit. >> >> I think (hope?) you mean "we do want to go beyond SQL to include lists, >> for example, which SQL does not permit".
> She is a self-aggrandizing ignorant who hasn't a clue what she is
> talking about.
Thank you, but I prefer to make up my own mind about people. Which I have in the case of Dawn, by the way; my comment was primarily an involuntary reflex. The point shouldn't be unfamiliar to anyone who has read (and participated) in the recent 1NF threads here, but there you have it. :s
-- JonReceived on Tue Apr 25 2006 - 10:12:07 CEST