Re: Lucid statement of the MV vs RM position?

Bob Badour wrote:
> Jon Heggland wrote:
>

>> dawn wrote:
>>> We can do both ;-)  We ought not dismiss relations, nor modeling with
>>> relations, but we do need to go beyond the RM to include lists, for
>>> example, which the Information Principle (of the RM) does not permit.
>>
>> I think (hope?) you mean "we do want to go beyond SQL to include lists,
>> for example, which SQL does not permit".

Thank you, but I prefer to make up my own mind about people. Which I have in the case of Dawn, by the way; my comment was primarily an involuntary reflex. The point shouldn't be unfamiliar to anyone who has read (and participated) in the recent 1NF threads here, but there you have it. :s

-- 
Jon