Re: Multiplicity, Change and MV
From: Bob Badour <bbadour_at_pei.sympatico.ca>
Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 02:53:26 GMT
Message-ID: <Gag3g.65421$VV4.1245788_at_ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca>
>> DonR wrote:
>>
>>> This leads me to believe that the people on this forum are not very
>>> open minded.
>>
>>
>> May I ask you what are the Pick people exactly doing on this forum?
>> There is no theory to it. Not a single challenging query. Not even a
>> compelling example. Not a worthy publication in a literature. And you
>> accuse Jan, who spend a lot of time in the XML research area (a big
>> no-no from relational perspective), being closed minded?
>>
>> BTW, for me the Pick discussion was over as soon as the level of detail
>> dropped to line delimiters. This is just about as exciting as
>> processing of files that I did today at work. Wanna discuss it?
Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 02:53:26 GMT
Message-ID: <Gag3g.65421$VV4.1245788_at_ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca>
Bob Badour wrote:
> Mikito Harakiri wrote: >
>> DonR wrote:
>>
>>> This leads me to believe that the people on this forum are not very
>>> open minded.
>>
>>
>> May I ask you what are the Pick people exactly doing on this forum?
>> There is no theory to it. Not a single challenging query. Not even a
>> compelling example. Not a worthy publication in a literature. And you
>> accuse Jan, who spend a lot of time in the XML research area (a big
>> no-no from relational perspective), being closed minded?
>>
>> BTW, for me the Pick discussion was over as soon as the level of detail
>> dropped to line delimiters. This is just about as exciting as
>> processing of files that I did today at work. Wanna discuss it?
> > Can we discuss the relative advantages of DOS 1.0 file descriptors? Can > we, please? Can we, huh? Can we? ;)
Oh wait, those were called FCBs weren't they? Not descriptors but control blocks. Sigh. Received on Tue Apr 25 2006 - 04:53:26 CEST