Re: Storing data and code in a Db with LISP-like interface
From: Frank Hamersley <terabitemightbe_at_bigpond.com>
Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2006 08:30:45 GMT
Message-ID: <VWG2g.13616$vy1.9262_at_news-server.bigpond.net.au>
>
> Do those sissy lisp and prolog forims have cranks, oops I mean
> educationally challenged persons who post long drivels that nobody else
> appears excited to read? c.d.t. has at least 2 active ones, and quite
> many dormant. This elevates c.d.t to the level of sci.math and
> sci.physics!
Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2006 08:30:45 GMT
Message-ID: <VWG2g.13616$vy1.9262_at_news-server.bigpond.net.au>
Mikito Harakiri wrote:
> Neo wrote:
>>> I appreciate your enthusiasm for your database, but why don't you stop cross-posting this to comp.lang.lisp? This thread has nothing to do with Lisp any more and the only relevance to Lisp it might ever have claimed was that your database uses a sexp-based notation for commands. >> I will remove LISP and Prolog from future posts in this thread. (I >> would have liked to seen a LISP/Prolog solution to the Judge Example. >> If someone cares to post it, please join back in via c.d.t.)
>
> Do those sissy lisp and prolog forims have cranks, oops I mean
> educationally challenged persons who post long drivels that nobody else
> appears excited to read? c.d.t. has at least 2 active ones, and quite
> many dormant. This elevates c.d.t to the level of sci.math and
> sci.physics!
Chuckle! Sadly, having consigned them to my killfile, the CDT traffic will drop markedly. Ah well, back to work!
Cheers, Frank. Received on Sun Apr 23 2006 - 10:30:45 CEST