Neo wrote:
>>>>Just a thought. I don't like entities. In fact I despise entities,
>>>>as the enemy of good information philosophy.
>>>
>>>What is your definition of an entity? What steps would one go through
>>>to verify something is an entity?
>>
>>I refer to them as they are specified by Chen. I've already pointed out
>>I believe their specification is impossible above simply being
>>arbitrary so your second question makes no sense to me.
>
>
> Ok, I just wanted to make sure there isn't anything in RM that would be
> considered an entity.
>
There is nothing in the RM called "entity."
There is nothing in the RM called "relationship."
Received on Sat Apr 22 2006 - 23:40:59 CDT
