Re: THe OverRelational Manifesto (ORM)

From: Alfredo Novoa <alfredo_novoa_at_hotmail.com>
Date: 19 Apr 2006 08:23:42 -0700
Message-ID: <1145460222.530385.271250@t31g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>

>is not a SET - it is just single relation. Do you understang the
>difference between single relation and SET of relations? It is the same
>as difference between single relation and DB.

Relation valued attributes in base relvars are deprecated except in some rare cases, and this is not one of them.

>And (I'm sure now) that some persons here need to get a lessons of
>reading. My question is not "how to describe SHIPMENT variable in D
>language" at all. I know it very well. I speak about the type
specification and type implimentation, about polimorphous names, about binding etc. and show with example how easy TheORM allows to realize some things. My question is "How D language can realize these things? if it can do it at all..."

Tutorial D might solve the problem a lot better than your stupid crap, but it does not allow undesirable features like sub-relvalrs and super-relvars, relation type definition, etc. Although you could create a valid D with these features.

Remaining nonsenses snipped. Received on Wed Apr 19 2006 - 10:23:42 CDT