Re: Multiplicity, Change and MV
From: Bob Badour <bbadour_at_pei.sympatico.ca>
Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2006 17:11:19 GMT
Message-ID: <XUu0g.60857$VV4.1129151_at_ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca>
> How does your preference for not using colored markers explain your
> inability to post any sensical/practical/verifiable solutions to the
> various problems that I assert are impractical with RMDBs?
Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2006 17:11:19 GMT
Message-ID: <XUu0g.60857$VV4.1129151_at_ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca>
Neo wrote:
>>>> X: Mine [schema] shows around 265 [tables] and it's growing. >>>Neo: Then why is it you haven't posted any sensical/practical/verifiable solutions to the various problems that I assert are impractical with RMDBs? (It seems you would have to be quite skilled with RMDBs to deal with such large schemas ...) >>X: I don't use colored marker and paper for changing the schema. I use a database.
> How does your preference for not using colored markers explain your
> inability to post any sensical/practical/verifiable solutions to the
> various problems that I assert are impractical with RMDBs?
I suggest the OP simply invoke Date's Principle of Incoherence. I see no reason to suspect x is incapable of anything relevant to the topic. On the other hand, we long ago established that you are incapable of comprehending simple english. Received on Sun Apr 16 2006 - 19:11:19 CEST