Re: THe OverRelational Manifesto (ORM)
From: Bob Badour <bbadour_at_pei.sympatico.ca>
Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2006 16:30:32 GMT
Message-ID: <Iiu0g.60833$VV4.1128713_at_ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca>
>
>
> You seem to be very interesting on this problem. I have a pair of
> answer to David and I think You should read it to understaend what I
> speak aboutYou can find it on page
> http://www.theorm.narod.ru/david_portas_asks.htm.
>
Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2006 16:30:32 GMT
Message-ID: <Iiu0g.60833$VV4.1128713_at_ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca>
U-gene wrote:
>>>What problem? If the TTM already addresses the problem well, why would >>>we need another solution? What does your solution do that no other >>>solution does? How is it at least as good a solution as the existing >>>solutions?
>
>
> You seem to be very interesting on this problem. I have a pair of
> answer to David and I think You should read it to understaend what I
> speak aboutYou can find it on page
> http://www.theorm.narod.ru/david_portas_asks.htm.
>
I read your longwinded nonsense, and it is a total non-answer. Confused and irrelevant. Basically, you are pulling a Celko.
You are nothing but another self-aggrandizing ignorant. Plonk! Received on Sun Apr 16 2006 - 18:30:32 CEST