Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> comp.databases.theory -> Re: Multiplicity, Change and MV

Re: Multiplicity, Change and MV

From: x <x_at_not-exists.org>
Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2006 18:18:48 +0300
Message-ID: <e1oefh$pae$1@emma.aioe.org>

"Neo" <neo55592_at_hotmail.com> wrote in message news:1145021068.512737.41540_at_i40g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
> > > ... as many as 50 or 60 vertical rectangular blocks
>
> > Mine shows around 265 such rectangular blocks and it's growing.
>
> Then why is it you haven't posted any sensical/practical/verifiable
> solutions to the various problems that I assert are impractical with
> RMDBs? (It *seems* you would have to be quite skilled with RMDBs to deal
> with such large schemas and still have a lot of time left over to post
> as frequently as you do in c.d.t.)

It only seems so. :-)
I don't use colored marker and paper for changing the schema. I use a database.

> > > If there is a more appropriate term [for schema], please advise.
>
> > Diagram ? Drawing ?
>
> Thanks, while either of these words could be used, schema seems more
> appropriate as it conveys that concept of detailed structure more
> accurately. How do you and others who use your schema with 265 tables
> refer to it?

There is a difference between a schema and a drawing of a schema. Received on Fri Apr 14 2006 - 10:18:48 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US