Re: Multiplicity, Change and MV

From: x <x_at_not-exists.org>
Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2006 18:10:04 +0300
Message-ID: <e1odv7$nbe$1_at_emma.aioe.org>


"Neo" <neo55592_at_hotmail.com> wrote in message news:1145022132.891499.94280_at_g10g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
> > > > X: your model has some new operator
>
> > > Neo: I have[n't] asserted that my model has some new operator.
>
> > X: Neither do I.
>
> Then why did you say it did?
>
> > > > X: what stops one to add your new operator to the RM?
>
> > > Neo: What new operator?
>
> > X: Who knows ?!?
>
> At this point, it seems you are the best person to know?
>
> > > > X: Maybe someone already done it.
>
> > > Neo: How do you suppose we can find him
> > > and how would you know that he was the one :)
>
> > X: Maybe you'll find him, maybe not. :-)

> I just found him, its you X. Tell us the new operator.

No. You did not.

"If the RM doesn't have the same scope as your model because your model has some new operator, what stops one to add your new operator to the RM ? Maybe someone already done it."

What part of "IF" you don't understand ? Received on Fri Apr 14 2006 - 17:10:04 CEST

Original text of this message