Re: Multiplicity, Change and MV
From: x <x_at_not-exists.org>
Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2006 09:10:07 +0300
Message-ID: <e1near$hva$1_at_emma.aioe.org>
Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2006 09:10:07 +0300
Message-ID: <e1near$hva$1_at_emma.aioe.org>
"Neo" <neo55592_at_hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1144960534.180442.307170_at_u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com...
> > .. If the RM doesn't have the same scope as your model because your
model has some new operator,
> I don't think I have asserted that my model has some new operator.
Neither do I.
> > ... what stops one to add your new operator to the RM?
> What new operator?
Who knows ?!?
> > Maybe someone already done it.
> How do you suppose we can find him and how would you know that he was
> the one :)
Maybe you'll find him, maybe not. :-) Received on Fri Apr 14 2006 - 08:10:07 CEST