Re: Storing data and code in a Db with LISP-like interface
From: mAsterdam <mAsterdam_at_vrijdag.org>
Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2006 01:35:47 +0200
Message-ID: <442c6ae6$0$11066$e4fe514c_at_news.xs4all.nl>
>
>
> Neither can a table. Indeed, they are typically even worse at this.
>
>
>
>
>
> A single table is just as bad in this respect.
Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2006 01:35:47 +0200
Message-ID: <442c6ae6$0$11066$e4fe514c_at_news.xs4all.nl>
jayessay wrote:
> mAsterdam <mAsterdam_at_vrijdag.org> writes:
>
>
>>topmind wrote: >> >>>(Trees tend to fail #1. They cannot easily deal with lots of >>>orthogonal >>>categories and relative/custom views.)
>
>
> Neither can a table. Indeed, they are typically even worse at this.
>
>
>
>>Me to's may be frowned upon, I know. Yet, yes! Trees tend to >>effect: first come first serve. When you have a vision not >>fitting the hierarchy of the status quo you are out of luck.
>
>
> A single table is just as bad in this respect.
How so?
(This may be professionally biased:)
Tables tend to come in herds.
Received on Fri Mar 31 2006 - 01:35:47 CEST