Re: More on lists and sets
From: Marshall Spight <marshall.spight_at_gmail.com>
Date: 26 Mar 2006 18:38:56 -0800
Message-ID: <1143427136.804441.256090_at_t31g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>
> As Jan Hidders has already pointed out, there is nothing theoretically
> innovative about this case. I'm interested anyway.
Date: 26 Mar 2006 18:38:56 -0800
Message-ID: <1143427136.804441.256090_at_t31g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>
David Cressey wrote:
>
> As Jan Hidders has already pointed out, there is nothing theoretically
> innovative about this case. I'm interested anyway.
Given Jan's role, as an academic, he is correct. However, I'm not an academic but a working programmer. As a working programmer, my interest in in useful tools, and let me tell you, I got nuttin' that can do these kinds of things. :-(
Marshall Received on Mon Mar 27 2006 - 04:38:56 CEST