Re: More on lists and sets

From: x <x_at_not-exists.org>
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2006 14:31:15 +0200
Message-ID: <dvu4el$pu8$1@emma.aioe.org>

"David Cressey" <dcressey_at_verizon.net> wrote in message news:6siUf.3912$yo1.513_at_trndny09...

> If so, the answer to your question is basically yes. Except that I want
> the interface to be even more automatic than SQL cursors. I want a
> transformer that on one side looks like a query, and accepts a result
table
> (set), and on the other side looks like a list that can be opened and
read
> one element at a time.

> Going the other way, I want to be able to build a list, one element at a
> time, and then shove the entire list into a transformer, and have the
list
> contents inserted into one of more tables.

I would like a value 'l' from a domain D to be seen as as being of type L or R. :-) Received on Thu Mar 23 2006 - 06:31:15 CST