Re: More on lists and sets

From: Mikito Harakiri <mikharakiri_nospaum_at_yahoo.com>
Date: 22 Mar 2006 22:30:05 -0800
Message-ID: <1143095405.206080.193370_at_z34g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>


paul c wrote:
> Also, I presume that the z*100+y ordering could
> have been y*100+z too.

It is just a conventiion which argument defines the order. It explicitly emphasizes noncommutativity of the intersection (oops, join aka "my intersection") operaton. Received on Thu Mar 23 2006 - 07:30:05 CET

Original text of this message