Re: More on lists and sets

From: JOG <jog_at_cs.nott.ac.uk>
Date: 20 Mar 2006 18:59:11 -0800
Message-ID: <1142909951.025198.152310_at_j33g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>


Jan Hidders wrote:
[snip]
> Moreover, integrating lists and bags into a
> declarative set-oriented language is basically a solved problem as the
> required ideas, knowledge and experience is already available in the
> literature, although it is sometimes dressed up as "nested relational",
> "object-oriented" or "xml" research.

That appears to be some very extreme dressing up (but that's research for you). Can you recommend any seminal references for this solved issue Jan? Received on Tue Mar 21 2006 - 03:59:11 CET

Original text of this message