Re: More on lists and sets
From: JOG <jog_at_cs.nott.ac.uk>
Date: 20 Mar 2006 18:59:11 -0800
Message-ID: <1142909951.025198.152310_at_j33g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
Date: 20 Mar 2006 18:59:11 -0800
Message-ID: <1142909951.025198.152310_at_j33g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
Jan Hidders wrote:
[snip]
> Moreover, integrating lists and bags into a
> declarative set-oriented language is basically a solved problem as the
> required ideas, knowledge and experience is already available in the
> literature, although it is sometimes dressed up as "nested relational",
> "object-oriented" or "xml" research.