Re: Declarative constraints in practical terms

From: x <x_at_not-exists.org>
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2006 13:44:00 +0200
Message-ID: <duroq3$6g5$1_at_emma.aioe.org>


"x" <x_at_not-exists.org> wrote in message news:duhb8u$vsa$1_at_emma.aioe.org...
>
> "dawn" <dawnwolthuis_at_gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:1141230300.386065.194130_at_v46g2000cwv.googlegroups.com...

> > > We think it is a command.
> > > The computer might think it is not. :-)

> > Yes, I can see that perspective. We can write statements that complete
> > the machine. *Snooze.*

The computer is the dragon you must [not] tickle. :-)

> > > > We are commanding the computer to do something, right?

> > That's how I see it. It doesn't do what I want. Then I tell it what
> > to do. Then it does what I want.

> > > And the computer would listen. Right. :-)

> > In it's own way.

> > Some people like theorems, others like proofs. Cheers! --dawn

> Divide et impera

Analyze AND perform. Received on Fri Mar 10 2006 - 12:44:00 CET

Original text of this message