Re: MV Keys

From: x <x_at_not-exists.org>
Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2006 10:37:23 +0200
Message-ID: <dum546$vs5$1_at_emma.aioe.org>


"x" <x_at_not-exists.org> wrote in message news:dum4vd$es4$1_at_emma.aioe.org...
>
> "Marshall Spight" <marshall.spight_at_gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:1141787070.196520.53850_at_e56g2000cwe.googlegroups.com...
> > David Cressey wrote:
> > > "Marshall Spight" <marshall.spight_at_gmail.com> wrote in message:
> > > >
> > > > The RA does not have any operations for looking at elements. :-O
> > >
> > > But the RA does rely on the existence of an operator that can test two
> > > references to elements to see whether or not they refer to the same
> element.
> > > You can't do all the RA operators, if you can't tell the elements
apart.
> >
> > Definitely. For every domain the RA operates on, it needs a
> > value-equality
> > test. This might make for some requirements on the type implementor or
> > in might be possible to do automatically, but it must be done.
>
> How can you choose between the type engine and the relational engine ?
> I guess you do implicit type conversions.

Or your type engine is the relational engine. Received on Wed Mar 08 2006 - 09:37:23 CET

Original text of this message