Re: MV Keys

From: x <x_at_not-exists.org>
Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2006 11:30:20 +0200
Message-ID: <dujjre$405$1_at_emma.aioe.org>


"x" <x_at_not-exists.org> wrote in message news:dujj87$ac6$1_at_emma.aioe.org...
>
> "vc" <boston103_at_hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:1141399477.707086.33490_at_z34g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
> >
> > Jon Heggland wrote:
> > > In article <1141393487.167645.153600_at_v46g2000cwv.googlegroups.com>,
> > > boston103_at_hotmail.com says...
> > > >
> > > > Saying that the date is not scalar is akin to claiming that 254 is
not
> > > > a scalar because it consists of units, tens and hundreds ;)
> > >
> > > You say that as if it were a silly thing to claim. :)
> >
> > Is it not ? Forgetting about time zones, the date is just a natural
> > number in a peculiar notation (or if one wants to be picky, a subtype
> > thereof). Is the natural number a compound type ?
>
> If you do not maintain a history then the date is not a scalar.

Or a date is not a date if you don't keep the history. Received on Tue Mar 07 2006 - 10:30:20 CET

Original text of this message