Re: MV Keys
From: mAsterdam <mAsterdam_at_vrijdag.org>
Date: Sat, 04 Mar 2006 08:47:51 +0100
Message-ID: <440945a0$0$11065$e4fe514c_at_news.xs4all.nl>
>
>
> It would not be working. Updates could be arbitrary.
Date: Sat, 04 Mar 2006 08:47:51 +0100
Message-ID: <440945a0$0$11065$e4fe514c_at_news.xs4all.nl>
Gene Wirchenko wrote:
> On Sat, 04 Mar 2006 00:07:51 +0100, mAsterdam <mAsterdam_at_vrijdag.org>
> wrote:
>
>>vc wrote: >> >>>mAsterdam wrote: >>>>Assuming MVCC the item which was the third item >>>>in MyList at transaction time would be removed. >>>>Results may be very unpleasant - that was my point - >>>>but would this constitute a CC failure? >>> >>>Sure it would. It would mean that your database CC is broken. >> >>In what way? Please explain.
>
>
> It would not be working. Updates could be arbitrary.
So, removeAt breaks concurrency. Please see my reply to vc. Received on Sat Mar 04 2006 - 08:47:51 CET