Re: MV Keys

From: vc <boston103_at_hotmail.com>
Date: 3 Mar 2006 07:24:37 -0800
Message-ID: <1141399477.707086.33490_at_z34g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>

Jon Heggland wrote:
> In article <1141393487.167645.153600_at_v46g2000cwv.googlegroups.com>,
> boston103_at_hotmail.com says...
> >
> > Saying that the date is not scalar is akin to claiming that 254 is not
> > a scalar because it consists of units, tens and hundreds ;)
>
> You say that as if it were a silly thing to claim. :)

Is it not ? Forgetting about time zones, the date is just a natural number in a peculiar notation (or if one wants to be picky, a subtype thereof). Is the natural number a compound type ?

> --
> Jon
Received on Fri Mar 03 2006 - 16:24:37 CET

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: ggroups_at_nonfx.net: "Psychological Test on Personal Orientation"
Previous message: dawn: "Re: Declarative constraints in practical terms"
In reply to Jon Heggland: "Re: MV Keys"
Next in thread: vldm10: "Re: MV Keys"
Reply: x: "Re: MV Keys"
Reply: vldm10: "Re: MV Keys"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message