Re: Attribution for modeling data with relations
From: Jan Hidders <jan.hidders_at_REMOVETHIS.pandora.be>
Date: Thu, 02 Mar 2006 20:37:06 GMT
Message-ID: <SHINf.290378$1G1.9208874_at_phobos.telenet-ops.be>
>
> I'll buy that. The tuple looks rather like a relation, however.
Date: Thu, 02 Mar 2006 20:37:06 GMT
Message-ID: <SHINf.290378$1G1.9208874_at_phobos.telenet-ops.be>
dawn wrote:
> Jan Hidders wrote:
>
>> dawn wrote: >> >>> [...] when I re-read >>> Nelson's 1965 paper while scanning it in* I saw that he uses >>> "relational terminology" and the term "relational terminology" >>> (page 2-8), even if just giving a hint of it. >> >> He's talking about the subscript notation. It has nothing to do >> with representing data with relations.
>
> I'll buy that. The tuple looks rather like a relation, however.
?? A tuple that looks like a relation?
> Is that subscript notation referred to as relational whether applied
> to a relation or not?
- Jan Hidders