Re: Database design

From: mAsterdam <mAsterdam_at_vrijdag.org>
Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2006 21:22:03 +0100
Message-ID: <4400bbfa$0$11062$e4fe514c_at_news.xs4all.nl>


Mark Johnson wrote:
>>>Are you saying that you find the above, confusing?

No, confused. As I said (you deleted it again, so I'll requote):

>> In the labour division between one writer and >> many readers it be better that the writer do the extraction work.

[snipped unclear text]

>>Yep. Are you saying that to deal with hierarchies in SQL databases
>>you have to put some effort into it?

>
>
> I don't know if you're trying to be clever, or 'funny', or what.

No. I was trying to make sense out of an unclear piece of text.

> But I
> took the time to clarify something which really needed no
> clarification. I see now that I shouldn't have done that. And I really
> don't know what else to add. And if you wish to characterize my
> suggestions for your glossary as all being somehow utterly
> incomprehensible, so be it. I was only trying to help.

Nobody did - I did quote your dimension/degree clarification BTW, and I thanked you for it. Received on Sat Feb 25 2006 - 21:22:03 CET

Original text of this message