Re: Declarative constraints in practical terms

From: David Cressey <dcressey_at_verizon.net>
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2006 22:22:47 GMT
Message-ID: <XGLLf.92$Gw2.8_at_trndny03>


"dawn" <dawnwolthuis_at_gmail.com> wrote in message news:1140792434.134165.76030_at_p10g2000cwp.googlegroups.com...

> The RM is definitely credible. The mathematics of it is credible. It
> brings some desirable features with it when used in practice.

Dawn,

I've had to wait two years, and wade through mountains of tripe, to see you write that!

I'm glad you finally admit it. Where you're going to get to, if you stay with it long enough, is not a counterrevolution but a synthesis.

The values of working withing the RM are real. They are not delusion. They are not going away. If you find a way to be more "agile", you are going to have to integrate it with the Information Principle, rather than discard it. Just my opinion, of course. But I'm as entitled to my opinion as you are to yours. Received on Fri Feb 24 2006 - 23:22:47 CET

Original text of this message