Re: The horse race

From: Mark Johnson <102334.12_at_compuserve.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2006 19:04:42 -0800
Message-ID: <pb9qv1t836p1tim8siuhdd30v9ujo97bdv_at_4ax.com>


"Marshall Spight" <marshall.spight_at_gmail.com> wrote:

>Mark Johnson wrote:

>> Calling someone who isn't being unresponsive a troll, is abusive.

>But you *are* being unresponsive. You ask the same question
>over and over

That means that someone who answered likely just skipped the question. So I answer what seems to be their objection, but then necessarily raise the original questions.

>Furthermore, the things you are talking about are all elementary
>set theory

That's a good reason to discuss it. Problems might reside in what had been deemed settled and axiomatic. There's another way of getting to this. And others have suggested this very limit of the RM, and then proposed their work on hierarchies. But I suppose I'm trying to make it plain, is all.

>you ask about the definition of a term, you are given the
>definition, and then you object that that's "merely" the definition.

I've never said any such thing.

I suspect you've very much misunderstood much of what I've posted. Received on Thu Feb 23 2006 - 04:04:42 CET

Original text of this message