Re: XQuery (and XML) vs LISP
From: Frank Hamersley <terabitemightbe_at_bigpond.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2006 05:22:55 GMT
Message-ID: <PySKf.13491$yK1.13298_at_news-server.bigpond.net.au>
>
> No, I referred, generally, to a general creation of workflow and
> processes design meant to simplify and reduce error and confusion in
> reasonably large projects, but which might seem overkill in simple
> ones. That's all.
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2006 05:22:55 GMT
Message-ID: <PySKf.13491$yK1.13298_at_news-server.bigpond.net.au>
Mark Johnson wrote:
> Frank Hamersley <terabitemightbe_at_bigpond.com> wrote:
>>Mark Johnson wrote: >>>Frank Hamersley <terabitemightbe_at_bigpond.com> wrote: >>>>Mark Johnson wrote: >>>>>Frank Hamersley <terabitemightbe_at_bigpond.com> wrote: >>>>>>Mark Johnson wrote: >>>>>>>"Marshall Spight" <marshall.spight_at_gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>Mark Johnson wrote: >>>>>>>>>Christopher Browne <cbbrowne_at_acm.org> wrote:[..]
>>OK - I had formed a view based on your previous posts that in your >>opinion the RM is was too cumbersome for small jobs
>
> No, I referred, generally, to a general creation of workflow and
> processes design meant to simplify and reduce error and confusion in
> reasonably large projects, but which might seem overkill in simple
> ones. That's all.
Fair enough - there is a base cost to using any of the big project methodologies regardless of how small the project is. So you are correct to infer there is a point at which they should not be deployed.
Cheers, Frank. Received on Wed Feb 22 2006 - 06:22:55 CET