x wrote:
> mAsterdam wrote:
>>x wrote:
>
>>>I don't know UML but I was exposed to some OMT after I've learned about
>>>formal languages, automata theory and RM. For this reason it was easy to
>>>grasp.
>>>
>>>http://microgold.com/Stage/UML_FAQ.html say it is an object oriented
>>>modeling method.
>
>>Which is a common misconception due to sloppy wording.
>
> Then why there are class diagrams in it ?
Because the class structure is one of the nice-to-have's
when you have a piece of software you are working on?
Maybe I don't understand the question.
Received on Mon Feb 13 2006 - 14:22:45 CST
