Re: OT - Best way to handle dbdebunk
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 13:08:11 +0200
Message-ID: <dsppav$4m0$1_at_emma.aioe.org>
"Alexandr Savinov" <spam_at_conceptoriented.com> wrote in message
news:43f06191$1_at_news.fhg.de...
> x schrieb:
> > "Alexandr Savinov" <spam_at_conceptoriented.com> wrote in message
> > news:43f043f5$1_at_news.fhg.de...
> >
> >> I think option c) would not be a bad decision. And the main argument is
> >> that this issue has nothing to do with data modeling in general and RM
> >> in particular. It is a mix of politics and psychology (or may be even
> >> psychiatry). There is many interesting problems concerning the
> >> phenomenon of DBD=CD/FP/HD but unfortunately not for discussion in this
> >> group. I qualify it as a fight for the legacy of EFC. I seriously doubt
> >> that it is interesting for you (and for anybody else except those
guys).
> >> And in this situation you simply have no chances to prove anything
> >> because you have different goals, use different methods and see the
> >> world differently. Let them stay in 20th century.
> >
> > Would you like a return of the Dark Ages ?
> Are you sure that we are not already there?
We are but there are peoples who hope that there is something they can do
about it.
Received on Mon Feb 13 2006 - 12:08:11 CET