Re: OT - Best way to handle dbdebunk
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 11:38:05 +0100
Message-ID: <43f06191$1_at_news.fhg.de>
x schrieb:
> "Alexandr Savinov" <spam_at_conceptoriented.com> wrote in message
> news:43f043f5$1_at_news.fhg.de...
>
>> I think option c) would not be a bad decision. And the main argument is
>> that this issue has nothing to do with data modeling in general and RM
>> in particular. It is a mix of politics and psychology (or may be even
>> psychiatry). There is many interesting problems concerning the
>> phenomenon of DBD=CD/FP/HD but unfortunately not for discussion in this
>> group. I qualify it as a fight for the legacy of EFC. I seriously doubt
>> that it is interesting for you (and for anybody else except those guys).
>> And in this situation you simply have no chances to prove anything
>> because you have different goals, use different methods and see the
>> world differently. Let them stay in 20th century.
>
> Would you like a return of the Dark Ages ?
Are you sure that we are not already there?
-- http://conceptoriented.comReceived on Mon Feb 13 2006 - 11:38:05 CET