Re: Database or store to handle 30 Mb/sec and 40,000 inserts/sec

From: Sybrand Bakker <postbus_at_sybrandb.demon.nl>
Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2006 12:14:49 +0100
Message-ID: <bjhru11q4tcg6s4hnecs8t4ujm94ud276g_at_4ax.com>

On Fri, 10 Feb 2006 22:40:48 GMT, "Excalibur" <excalibur21_at_bigpond.com> wrote:

>Hi Murthi
>Thanks for the response. People not top posting drive me nuts. I have
>followed a thread and want to sea the latest response not piles of pointy
>brackets. Who dreamed up this so-called etiquette anyway?
>Peter McMurray

In this group it's exactly the opposite: many posters just hate morons like you insisting on top-posting. The human species happens to read from top to bottom: that is apart from the people brainwashed by the Evil Empire driven by Bill Gates, who - you are a specific exampledemonstrate over and over and over again they are just too damn lazy to scroll down.

--
Sybrand Bakker, Senior Oracle DBA

Received on Sat Feb 11 2006 - 12:14:49 CET

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Sybrand Bakker: "Re: Database or store to handle 30 Mb/sec and 40,000 inserts/sec"
Previous message: Tony Rogerson: "Re: Database or store to handle 30 Mb/sec and 40,000 inserts/sec"
Maybe in reply to: uspensky_at_gmail.com: "Database or store to handle 30 Mb/sec and 40,000 inserts/sec"
In reply to Ed Sheehan: "Re: Database or store to handle 30 Mb/sec and 40,000 inserts/sec"
Next in thread: Luke Webber: "Re: Database or store to handle 30 Mb/sec and 40,000 inserts/sec"
Reply: Tony Rogerson: "Re: Database or store to handle 30 Mb/sec and 40,000 inserts/sec"
Reply: murthi: "Re: Database or store to handle 30 Mb/sec and 40,000 inserts/sec"
Reply: Luke Webber: "Re: Database or store to handle 30 Mb/sec and 40,000 inserts/sec"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message