Re: Database or store to handle 30 Mb/sec and 40,000 inserts/sec

From: Frank van Bortel <frank.van.bortel_at_gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 19:54:42 +0100
Message-ID: <dsimqj$1tp$1_at_news2.zwoll1.ov.home.nl>


Tony Rogerson wrote:
> Right then Joel, lets have a go then.
>
> Whats your argument?
>
> Even on a build your own box costing around £500 can deliver over 50MBytes /
> second write and read speeds using Windows Server.
>
> Go for the 64 bit version and you can get quite a few GBytes of memory, most
> entry level boards <£100 take 4GB of DDR.
>

Don't top post - can I suggest you use a decent news reader? As you see, your ugly format/utility cuts off the rest of the thread.

Point is: a decent Linux will deliver better throughput on the *same* hardware. Changed 'twice the' into 'better'. Can't substantiate twice, can better.

And personally, I'd love to see you stop promoting non-oracle stuff here. It's annoying; most people here hate Microsoft anyway. Just a little further, and you're spamming.

-- 
Regards,
Frank van Bortel

Top-posting is one way to shut me up...
Received on Fri Feb 10 2006 - 19:54:42 CET

Original text of this message