Re: open source PostgreSQL not supportable?
From: DA Morgan <damorgan_at_psoug.org>
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 15:51:12 -0800
Message-ID: <1136937071.405350_at_jetspin.drizzle.com>
>
>
> My employer's stock trades on NYSE. We have internal auditors working
> with KPMG. I ask again, which auditors have said what you claim?
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 15:51:12 -0800
Message-ID: <1136937071.405350_at_jetspin.drizzle.com>
Bruce Lewis wrote:
> DA Morgan <damorgan_at_psoug.org> writes:
>
>
>>Well the auditors at a number of public companies in the Pacific >>Northwest have been rather clear about it. Are you with a publicly >>held company?
>
>
> My employer's stock trades on NYSE. We have internal auditors working
> with KPMG. I ask again, which auditors have said what you claim?
KPMG: Seattle Washington
At various companies I work with all three.
And they have all clearly stated that if a CFO can not guarantee the
providence of the numbers used to make financial decisions and stated
publicly in government filings and representations the corporations
are at risk.
PWC: Seattle Washington
Deloitte & Touche: Seattle Washington
If you have an auditor that feels otherwise please contact me off-line and provide me with their contact information. I want to get them to make a formal representation on-the-record with the local office.
Thanks.
-- Daniel A. Morgan http://www.psoug.org damorgan_at_x.washington.edu (replace x with u to respond)Received on Wed Jan 11 2006 - 00:51:12 CET