Re: 3vl 2vl and NULL
Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2005 02:26:59 GMT
Message-ID: <TX5mf.1799$Dd2.1148_at_newsread3.news.atl.earthlink.net>
"dawn" <dawnwolthuis_at_gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1134055293.865826.300270_at_g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> If you were to look at the dollars spent on U2 and the dollars spent on
> DB2, ... I'm certain there are many more features in DB2, and I
> respect the product (without having used it in any production
> environment) but it is SQL-based which might explain why I suspect
> suspect that if we could have a database-shootout for use in software
> development, U2 just might win.
You're begging the question.
If there's something wrong with DB2, can you identify what's wrong?
If there's something wrong with SQL, can you identify what's wrong?
What's a "database shootout", anyway? Received on Fri Dec 09 2005 - 03:26:59 CET