Re: 3vl 2vl and NULL

From: David Cressey <david.cressey_at_earthlink.net>
Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2005 02:26:59 GMT
Message-ID: <TX5mf.1799$Dd2.1148@newsread3.news.atl.earthlink.net>

"dawn" <dawnwolthuis_at_gmail.com> wrote in message news:1134055293.865826.300270_at_g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...

> If you were to look at the dollars spent on U2 and the dollars spent on
> DB2, ... I'm certain there are many more features in DB2, and I
> respect the product (without having used it in any production
> environment) but it is SQL-based which might explain why I suspect
> suspect that if we could have a database-shootout for use in software
> development, U2 just might win.

You're begging the question.
If there's something wrong with DB2, can you identify what's wrong? If there's something wrong with SQL, can you identify what's wrong?

What's a "database shootout", anyway? Received on Thu Dec 08 2005 - 20:26:59 CST