Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> comp.databases.theory -> Re: 3vl 2vl and NULL

Re: 3vl 2vl and NULL

From: paul c <toledobythesea_at_oohay.ac>
Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2005 13:52:28 GMT
Message-ID: <wIglf.51182$ki.23641@pd7tw2no> 





David Cressey wrote:


> ..

> 


>>
>>When it comes to a strict treatment of the RM, avoiding nulls, I could
>>say that I would prefer 700 tables without nulls (along with a mere ten
>>thousand lines of code) over 600 tables without nulls!




> 

> 

> Did you make a typo in the above?

> ...




You guessed it (should have said "600 with nulls").



cheers,


p
Received on Tue Dec 06 2005 - 07:52:28 CST












Original text of this message













  HOME |
  ASK QUESTION |
  ADD INFO |
  SEARCH |
  E-MAIL US