Re: 3vl 2vl and NULL
From: paul c <toledobythesea_at_oohay.ac>
Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2005 13:52:28 GMT
Message-ID: <wIglf.51182$ki.23641_at_pd7tw2no>
>
>
> Did you make a typo in the above?
> ...
Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2005 13:52:28 GMT
Message-ID: <wIglf.51182$ki.23641_at_pd7tw2no>
David Cressey wrote:
> ..
>
>> >>When it comes to a strict treatment of the RM, avoiding nulls, I could >>say that I would prefer 700 tables without nulls (along with a mere ten >>thousand lines of code) over 600 tables without nulls!
>
>
> Did you make a typo in the above?
> ...
You guessed it (should have said "600 with nulls").
cheers,
p
Received on Tue Dec 06 2005 - 14:52:28 CET