Path: dp-news.maxwell.syr.edu!spool.maxwell.syr.edu!drn.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!news.tele.dk!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!lnewsoutpeer00.lnd.ops.eu.uu.net!lnewsinpeer01.lnd.ops.eu.uu.net!emea.uu.net!news.sap-ag.de!news2!news.sap-ag.de!not-for-mail
From: Daniel Dittmar <daniel.dittmar@sap.corp>
Newsgroups: comp.databases.theory
Subject: Re: ACID et al
Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2005 13:30:20 +0100
Organization: SAP AG
Lines: 27
Message-ID: <dn408s$lls$1@news.sap-ag.de>
References: <xZYkf.52828$Eq5.42138@pd7tw1no>   <1133799611.341204.196810@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com>   <Zn_kf.52196$Gd6.21041@pd7tw3no>   <1133808898.178219.154100@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>   <zy0lf.52652$Gd6.6816@pd7tw3no>   <1133811654.468941.69150@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>   <j22lf.47846$ki.22240@pd7tw2no>   <dn3pgt$gdl$1@news.sap-ag.de> <1133867370.295735.64380@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: p123523.dhcp.ber.sap.corp
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: news.sap-ag.de 1133872220 22204 10.29.14.93 (6 Dec 2005 12:30:20 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: newsmaster@sap.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2005 12:30:20 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Windows/20050716)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
In-Reply-To: <1133867370.295735.64380@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>
Xref: dp-news.maxwell.syr.edu comp.databases.theory:34910

vc wrote:
> Daniel Dittmar wrote:
> [...]
> 
>>But the database engines still need row level locking (database engines
>>using page level locking were not scalable enough). While db locks might
>>be less relevant in certain parts of the system, they seem to be still
>>very important in others.
>>
>>Daniel
> 
> 
> Did you read what the OP actually wrote ? He does not need any
> concurrency control as access to the DB is serial.
> 

The OP thinks that most concurrency issues are handled better in the 
application layer than in the database layer. I described an 
architecture that does *mostly* that. I rephrase 'But the database 
engines still need row level locking' as:

It is a requirement for database engines  used with SAP R/3 to support 
row level locking. Therefor, the description in my post does not tell 
the complete story. An important piece is missing for which I don't have 
the details.

Daniel
