Re: ACID et al

From: vc <boston103_at_hotmail.com>
Date: 6 Dec 2005 03:09:30 -0800
Message-ID: <1133867370.295735.64380@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>

Daniel Dittmar wrote:
[...]
> But the database engines still need row level locking (database engines
> using page level locking were not scalable enough). While db locks might
> be less relevant in certain parts of the system, they seem to be still
> very important in others.
>
> Daniel

Did you read what the OP actually wrote ? He does not need any concurrency control as access to the DB is serial. Received on Tue Dec 06 2005 - 05:09:30 CST