Re: 3vl 2vl and NULL

From: David Cressey <david.cressey_at_earthlink.net>
Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2005 13:28:45 GMT
Message-ID: <hgXkf.10160$wf.7396@newsread3.news.atl.earthlink.net>

"dawn" <dawnwolthuis_at_gmail.com> wrote in message news:1133723820.633095.187640_at_g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> David Cressey wrote:

> > Q: is 4 greater than (no comment)?
> > A: (no comment)
>
> Here is where you are injecting a third value where I just think it is
> so much easier to work with a 2VL.

(no comment) isn't a value. It's a marker indicating the absence of a value.

Here we go again.

This is the thread that never ends. Received on Mon Dec 05 2005 - 07:28:45 CST