Re: Encoding materialized path in an atomic value.
From: mAsterdam <mAsterdam_at_vrijdag.org>
Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2005 00:12:21 +0200
Message-ID: <4335cf20$0$11075$e4fe514c_at_news.xs4all.nl>
Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2005 00:12:21 +0200
Message-ID: <4335cf20$0$11075$e4fe514c_at_news.xs4all.nl>
David Cressey wrote:
> (The point about imposing an articicial order amongst siblings neatly
> summarizes an extended debate between dawn and many of the rest of us
> concerning the relationship between sets and list.)
Heh - I'ld really like to see Marshall Spight to come
forward with what he'ld like to see in the
"Spight list algebra". As you'll all have noticed
by now, I'm not comfortable with how mathematicians
deal with operators, relations and (what I would call)
information types - but I do spend some time contemplating
those (see PIZZA and mErge thread in c.l.p.).
Received on Sun Sep 25 2005 - 00:12:21 CEST